[관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)

 1  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-1
 2  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-2
 3  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-3
 4  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-4
 5  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-5
 6  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-6
 7  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-7
 8  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-8
 9  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-9
 10  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-10
 11  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-11
 12  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-12
 13  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-13
 14  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-14
 15  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-15
 16  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-16
 17  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-17
 18  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-18
 19  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-19
 20  [관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)-20
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
[관리회계] 한국전력공사 KEPCO 경영성과 평가를 위한 균형성과표(BSC)(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1. Executive Summary
2. Company information
2.1 Product & Services
2.2 Business Environment

3. Critical Analysis
3.1 Current Performance Evaluation Systems
3.2 Application of Balanced Scorecard
3.3 Evaluation & Suggestions

4. Appendix & Bibliography

본문내용
KEPCO is doing their business in the electric industry. KEPCO has 3 business models: power generation, power transmission, power distribution. Its market share reaches up to nearly 100% Because of this, KEPCO maintains monopoly position.
Based on SWOT analysis of KEPCO, our team drew the following strategies; diversification strategy, key strategy, strengthening strategy, and bypass strategy. These strategies may help out KEPCO on effectively managing the entire firm.
According to KEPCO strategic objective & Evaluation Objective, our group focuses on performance evaluation by comparing btw objectives & performance, building BSC, Setting up KPI.
We classified each KPIs and CSFs by BSC perspective and checked their relationship with strategic goals. We concluded that the KPIs are properly set to each CSF and most of KPIs are quantitative so that we can observe if it is good or not.
Through current performance evaluation system analysis, we decide current KPI using 4 perspectives from BSC
There are 2 potential issues on current system. First one is that too much immeasurable KPI may lead to subjective evaluation. Another difficulty is that Non-Separation between new growth business & existing business is able to result in de-motivation of new growth business
In order to correct errors and improve efficiency in the corporate level, KEPCO has made some guidelines. Its main objectives are reinforcing correlation between plan and real action, and having objectivity by increasing the proportion of quantitative index.
For achieving management goal more efficiently, KEPCO is planning to reorganize the organization. They are planning to change the organization more in detail, according to principles of organizing the headquarter’s assessment.

What are Our Financial Goals ?
Has our financial performance improved ?


What customers do we want to serve & how are we going to retain them ?
Do customers recognized that we are delivering more value ?


What internal business processes are critical to providing value to customers ?
Have we improved key processes so that we can deliver more value ?


Are we maintaining our ability to change and improve?


A. Expansion and improvement of measurement index for effective achievement of corporate objective
□ Background
Enforcement of connection between corporate objective/strategy and index
Availability improvement of attainment of goal
□ Contents
Securing balance between quantitative/immeasurable assessment importance by extension of weighted index
- Increasing the weight of essential quantitative index :10  20 points
Changing immeasurable index to quantitative : 10 points
Introducing assessment of fixed difficulty and raising the level of objectives
Mandating detailed proposal including the reason of goal setting
 


참고문헌

Reference : www.kepco.co.kr
www.dart.fss.or.kr