소개글
[재무관리] Daum Vs NHN, Google(GOOG) Vs Info Space(INSP) 비교(~2009)(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
Part 1 Daum Vs NHN
1. Common Finance Ratios of the two counterparts:
2. Dupont Identities Analysis:
3. Determination of relatively under-valued stock & consecutive supports:
Part 2 Google (GOOG) Vs Info Space (INSP)
1. Common Finance Ratios of the two counterparts:
2. Dupont Identities Analysis:
3. Determination of relatively under-valued stock & consecutive supports:
본문내용
Part 2 Google (GOOG) Vs Info Space (INSP)
1. Common Finance Ratios of the two counterparts:
2007 2008 2009 Average
INSP GOOG INSP GOOG INSP GOOG INSP GOOG
1. Short-term solvency, or liquidity ratios
Current Ratio 1.4 8.49 7.69 8.77 6.37 10.62 5.15 9.29
Quick Ratio 1.4 8.49 7.69 8.77 6.37 10.62 5.15 9.29
Cash Ratio 1.23 2.99 1.83 3.76 2.05 3.71 1.7 3.49
NWC to Total Assets 0.24 0.6 0.63 0.56 0.68 0.65 0.52 0.6
Interval Measure 1328.1 1298.33 1203.19 1125.8 1536.77 1639.28 1356.02 1354.47
- In terms of Current ratio, Google has roughly 2 times greater value. This implies that the company has relatively lower proportion of liabilities in its assets. This further stretches out to an assumption that the company has greater capability in paying debt back in next 12 months, hence inhabiting higher probability in meeting creditors’ demands.
- Considering the industry’s exclusive characteristics, there are no inventories for both companies. Thus, their Quick Ratios are equal to the Current Ratios.
- Again, Google has about 2 times greater value for Cash Ratio. This implies that the company is more capable of liquidation to cover short-term liabilities.
- There is little to focus on the difference between the values of NWC to Total Assets and Interval Measure.
-
2. Asset utilization, or turnover ratios
Inventory Turnover - - - - - - - -
Days' sales in Inventory - - - - - - - -