소개글
Trade Off btw Equity & Efficiency에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1.Explaining ‘Free Lunch Program’
2.From Nozick and Rawls’ Point of View
3.Trade Off between equity & efficiency
4.Recommendation
본문내용
Measurements
Satisfaction analysis about the Free Lunch
Time order investigation about the teenager's nutrition status
Rate of the poorly-fed children and the changes of GPA
May be too subjective to apply too many variables
Nozick
Not equitable
Limitations of freedom such as the right to get various kinds of foods or usage of economic resources.
Movement of economic resources is occurred from lower income group to higher income group
Rawls
Equitable / Not Equitable
Rawls argued that ensuring the basic level of resources is an essential factor for liberty
‘Food' means the minimum condition to live an ordinary life
Rawls emphasized the social agreement when implementing any kind of policy
Free Lunch program has been causing very severe controversy in people from all walks of life
To improve social equity by relieving family budget and disharmony of every student
The program is actually implemented through another tax
it brings problems like quality degradation on school meals or manpower shortage – Balloon Effect
Diminishing the intermediate cost by direct connection with schools to rural societies
Giving selective support which is providing Free Lunch to whom are really needed
Parents who are relevant to Free Lunch program can apply to the district dong office personally
Installing electronic information system on administration department in schools