최근 몇 년간 몇몇 이전 연구 결과의 타당성에 문제를 제기하며 조직 갈등 연구를 받쳐주고 있는 기본적인 가정의 상당부분이 변했다. 갈등이 복잡하고 다차원적이고 정황 구체적이라는 시각에서 시작해서, 이번 연구는 혁신 과정의 상황에서 나타나는 주요 갈등의 선행자, 조절자, 결과에 대해 신선하
conflict relationships, they would necessarily confront a source. In other words, newsworkers utilize a calculus that includes the legitimate value of disputing sources and conflict when balancing their relationship with sources and the demand for work. The calculus is only made more complex by factors of professionalism, isolation, and group norms, which are discussed below.
2-2) Professional
Proposal of legislation Conflict
② Committee’s examination
③ Lobby to the two houses of Congress
→ Lots of conflict
④ Becoming laws
Strong Conviction &
Political Responsibility
② Balance Between
Reason And Emotion
③ Lobby to the two houses of Congress
→ Lots of conflict
④ Becoming laws
Strong Conviction &
Political Responsibility
② Balance Between
Reason And Emotion
Failed states in a World of Terror
The Clash of Civilizations?
The Clash of Ignorance
Security dilemma and ethnic conflict
Discussion questions
Having failed at some of the basic conditions and responsibilities of a sovereign government
Loss of physical control of its territory
Erosion of legitimate authority to make collective decisions
Inability to provide reasonable public