Non-intervention is a norm in international society. It is illegal under the UN charter 2:4 article for states to intervene in other states’ internal affairs. However, humanitarian intervention is an exception to this and has been frequently used to justify states’ acts in intervening other states’ affairs since the Second World War. Humanitarian intervention is an act that allows interferi
Pros of Humanitarian Intervention
The legal argument
UN charter
1(3)
To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion; and
55
With a view
2. Two Faces of American Foreign Policy : Realism and Humanitarian Intervention
1) U.S. and Realistic Foreign Policy
2) U.S. and Humanitarian Intervention
3. Iraq War and State of Egypt : Different Reaction of U.S.
1) A Case from the Iraq War
2) A Case from the State of Egypt
3) Iraq and Egypt : A Gap between Realism and Humanitarian Intervention
humanitarian intervention which reflects two faces of their foreign policy.
U.S. attacked Iraq under the reason of protection of liberalism and they justifies that it was a humanitarian intervention, but why did the U.S. connived 30years of dictatorship of Mubarak's regime in Egypt? Is it because of the liberalism and human rights issues in Egypt in international society was on right track? Or
Humanitarian Motives) 인도주의적 동기(Humanitarian Motives)는 인간의 가장 1차적인 감정인 동정심과 이타주의에 기반한 행위의 근거라고 할 수 있다. 근대적인 인도주의의 근원은 18세기에 새로 등장한 중간 계층자들의 인권문제와 관련하여 살펴볼 수 있다. 당시의 사상은 박애주의, 인도주의, 평등 및 사회정