◎Put it in your mouth, light it up[불을 붙이면], and you're gonna get your fix.[담배를 어느 정도 피워서 몸이 만족 할 수 있는 그 정도의 양으로 만들어야 된다.]
[당신이 만족할 만한 양의 니코틴을 얻게 된다.]
◎The straw[볏짚] that broke the camel's back for me[낙타 등을 부러뜨린 볏짚 한 가닥][낙타 등에 올린 짐의
OBJECTIVES
This class aims to develop the students' awareness of these features:
-a verb can consist of two parts
-a verb can consist of two parts that are not next to each other
-there are separable and inseparable transitive phrasal verbs
-a pronoun object of a separable phrasal verb must go between the two parts
-phrasal verbs are often idiomatic
(중략)
You need to use spec
The verb say takes a that-clause as a direct object, optionally with to + object ,and only say takes a direct quotation as a direct object.
And say takes a limited number of noun phrases.
Many say that seat belts are unnecessary.
Tim said to Marco, “It's funny, It looks like a turtle.”
He said that “it is necessary to get up
earlier.”
They said some nice things about you.
① Contraction with “not”
(3) a. He shouldn’t see her.
b. *He worksn’t with her
→ Main verbs cannot contract with not.
(4) a. He may not come.
b. *He mayn’t come.
c. We shan’t be very long.
d. We won’t be very long.
→ May cannot contract with not.
Shan’t exists only in British English.
② Subject-aux inversion in yes/no questions &
tag questions
Exercise V
(1) *Could you turn off the fire and on the light?
In this case, we can assure that 'turn off' is phrasal verb in few perspectives. First, we can only have the preposition after the pronominal object as in ‘turn it off’ but ‘*turn off it’. The other reason is that preposing of ‘on the light’ is impossible because ‘turn on’ itself is a phrasal verb.
Therefore, we can