[정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)

 1  [정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)-1
 2  [정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)-2
 3  [정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)-3
 4  [정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)-4
 5  [정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)-5
 6  [정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)-6
※ 미리보기 이미지는 최대 20페이지까지만 지원합니다.
  • 분야
  • 등록일
  • 페이지/형식
  • 구매가격
  • 적립금
자료 다운로드  네이버 로그인
소개글
[정책집행론] 정책집행론의 포괄적 접근(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
1. Introduction



2. Definition of 'Top-down approach & Bottom-up
approach' and Comparison



3. Case study

1) Application of New Model

2) Analysis about cases



4. Conclusion



본문내용
3. Case Study
1) The application of the new model
The most significant point between the top-down and the bottom-up approaches depends upon the volume of the discretionary rights. We are going to only look into the largeness and smallness of the discretionary rights regardless of the type of discretion. Therefore standing with the policy implementation, our group members thought that the degree of allowing discretion has a great effect on success of failure of policy implementation.
The size for group of beneficiary
The volume of conflict

Largeness
Smallness
Unidentified public
Top-down(the minimum of the discretionary rights)
Top-down(the minimum of the discretionary rights)
Specific group
Bottom-up(the maximum of the discretionary rights)
Bottom-up(the maximum of the discretionary rights)

As a result of debating on the degree of allowing discretion, we concluded that the conflict and the size for group of beneficiary are the main variables which decide the discretionary rights. Therefore, we are going to apply this model to the real case and analyze, and prove that this model could be justifiable.

2) Analysis about cases

a. The volume of the conflict "Large"-Unidentified public
(U.S. the revision of health care insurance)
U.S.'s the revision of the health care insurance belongs to this category. The revision had huge volume of the conflict because the insurance companies and medicine companies are strongly negative for this policy decision. However most of U.S. citizens get the profit by the policy implementation, so the beneficiary group is huge too. Therefore standing with the policy implementation, the leadership which Barack Obama, the president of U.S. showed to U.S. citizen is required and the legal standard is required more than the discretionary rights because most U.S. citizens
오늘 본 자료
더보기
  • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
해당 정보 및 게시물의 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다. 위 정보 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용,무단 전재·배포는 금지되어 있습니다. 저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁요소 발견 시 고객센터에 신고해 주시기 바랍니다.