소개글
WTO-아르헨티나, 칠레 농산물 분쟁(영문)에 대한 자료입니다.
목차
Introduction of our Case
Question1 – The Causes?
Question2 – The Relevance to Our Class
– Comparative Advantage of Products in Argentina
– Price Brand System of Chile (Ad valorem tariff, Protectionism)
– Dispute Settlement Mechanism of WTO
Question3 – Lessons from this case
Question4 – Update
Question5 – Opinions
본문내용
They believed
Chile would comply with the ECA35 Group’s recommendation,
but Chile didn’t.
India
Argentina’s most important market.
nearly doubled import tariffs,
China
Argentina’s third buyer,
adapted non-trade barriers
Negative effects on Argentine’s profits
Argentina considered that
these measures raised questions concerning
the obligations of Chile under various agreements.
According to Argentina,
the provisions with which the measures relating to the said price band system,
and the safeguard measures are
inconsistent.
In terms of domestic institutional settings
- By taking these procedures, experience and learning can be accumulated by the same agency and outsourcing would be limited.
In terms of business participation
- the sense of shared responsibility is a key element to success.
In terms of capacity building
- all the actors have gained experience.
In terms of bargaining strategy
- to avoid cross-sectoral pressures in bilateral relations with Chile, the temporal de-linking of issues and taking them one at a time was crucial.