CASE IDENTIFICATION 사례 식별
DATE OF DECISION : 2002년 11월 27일
JURISDICTION : 중국
SELLER'S COUNTRY : 중국(원고)
BUYER'S COUNTRY : 일본(피고)
GOODS INVOLVED : 커런덤 화이트
TRIBUNAL: 고등 인민 법원, 닝샤 후이 자율 지역
JUDGE(S): 석 판사: Ye, Jinzhong; 판사: Kang, Guohua; 판사: Zhu, Hong
CASE NUMBER/DOCKET NUMBER: (2002) Ningminshangzhon
3. Case Study
1) The application of the new model
The most significant point between the top-down and the bottom-up approaches depends upon the volume of the discretionary rights. We are going to only look into the largeness and smallness of the discretionary rights regardless of the type of discretion. Therefore standing with the policy implementation, our group members thought that the degre
There is evidence that this factory was not complete and that it presented defects including the cover and presence of dust, filthiness, inclusive humidity -- all of which can damage delicate impression mechanisms. And [Seller] made a gigantic effort to document the factory's condition, essentially bringing to this process probatory material that had already been entered in the records of a relat
Art. 4(1) of the Lugano Convention, the Swiss IPRG [*] applies in this case. According to IPRG Art. 113, a claim may be filed with the Swiss court of the place of performance of the obligation in question if the obligation is to be performed in Switzerland, even though the defendant has neither a place of residence, nor a place of business in Switzerland. Under CISG Art. 57(1)(a), if the
Case 속 Fedex의 특징
기존의 Fedex : 해외영업 + 국내영업
Case 속 Fedex : 오직 국내 영업만을 가정함
함께 생각해봅시다
Terminal은 현재 어떤 center로 여겨지는가?
얼마만큼의 권한과 책임을 갖고 있는가?
Terminal 과 Hub 모두 어떻게 성과 평가를 할 것인가?
3. 수익/비용 배분
각 Terminal = invert center &