Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...
Syntactic studies of ana phora in the past can be characterized as attempts to explain co-reference in terms of syntactic notions of prominence and coreference domain. This syntactic approach to the study of pronominal reference seems to be basically correct in view of the fact that in all the claea...