( Young Sik Choi )대한언어학회, 언어학[2014] 제22권 제3호, 133~154페이지(총22페이지)
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
( Chong Hyuck Kim )대한언어학회, 언어학[2014] 제22권 제3호, 155~175페이지(총21페이지)
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
( Hong Won Seo )대한언어학회, 언어학[2014] 제22권 제3호, 176~193페이지(총18페이지)
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...
I suggest that the internally headed relative clause in Korean is an adjunct serving as the topic for the main clause, with pro projecting a separate projection in the argument position of the main clause. I suggest that Korean utilizes two ways of construal for the covert pronoun in the main clause...